Ads / Brainwashing Corporate Rule Media Monopoly  
 
  :: Corporate Rule/ Corporate Rule    
War Profiteers!
“Privatization,” “Free Trade” “hegemony” “Pax America,” these words are thrown around a lot today. They all add up to one thing – imperialism. The U.S. government has been following an imperialist agenda for a long time, however, it has only been since the advent of the Bush presidency that imperial rule has become the primary goal of the administration’s policies. If you read the strategies laid out by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), it is obvious that in a very Pinky and the Brain-esk way, they ( meaning: among others, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and Jeb Bush) are determined to “Take Over the World.”
They have written that “American foreign and defense policy is adrift… Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests…” Project for a New America, statement of principles, 1997.
A combination of Big Corporations using big money, small-minded people and enormous greed now rule a growing number of countries. Behind a thin veneer of “development” and “free trade” they scheme for ever expanding profits at the expense of the public, the environment and global harmony.
Below are a few of the huge monopolies that are awakening the once slumbering masses with their increasingly bold misbehavior.
Bechtel Corporation
It is not surprising that Bechtel, one of the largest construction-engineering companies in the country, got the lion’s share of contracts for the reconstruction of Iraq. They’ve got pull. Their CEO, Riley P. Bechtel, sits on Bush’s Export Council, whose members give advice on new ways to make money for corporations globally. They have a former Defense Secretary and a former Secretary of State on their board of directors and their senior vice president is a retired four-star general.
Bechtel will rebuild much of Iraq’s basic infrastructure, i.e. power grids, water and sewage systems. The US Agency for International Development (USAID) has awarded Bechtel a total of $680 million dollars for the rebuilding of Iraq, but many say that figure could increase to as much as $20 billion. Despite promises of sub-contracting to the Iraqi’s themselves (Shouldn’t the people that live there prosper from the re-building of it?!) Bechtel has used mainly British, U.S. and their allies as sub-contractors (how cute the old and the new imperialism unite for a common cause- it’s like Madonna and Britney Spears!)
It is no surprise that many are yelling favoritism over the awarded contracts. All companies chosen have strong political ties and many have been involved in scandals that should have automatically taken them out of the running. In the past, Bechtel has cost taxpayers millions in nuclear waste clean up (www.corpwatch.org) and in a particularly “Duhhh” moment, Bechtel cost the city of Boston $991,000 because its engineers forgot to take into account an existing stadium when designing the Central Artery/Tunnel Project, better known as the “Big Dig.” (www.boston.com)
Halliburton Co.
Halliburton subsidiary, Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) has been under scrutiny for its contract, awarded by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, which put KBR in control of Iraq’s oil repair and distribution. Among the cries of favoritism, Rep. Henry Waxman, has been leading an investigation into KBR’s billing for its gas distribution.
“From the facts available to us, Halliburton seems to be inflating gasoline prices at a great cost to American taxpayers. The overcharging by Halliburton is so extreme that one expert privately called it ‘highway robbery,” writes Waxman. (corpwatch)
Halliburton charges an average of $1.59 per gallon, adding a 2-7 percent fee against this amount. Halliburton states this is fair and competitive pricing, but others disagree. When asked about these costs, Waxman’s experts were “stunned.” By their estimation a reasonable transport cost would be around 10 to 25 cents per gallon. As of September 19th, the U.S. has already paid Halliburton $300 million to distribute 190 million gallons of gas.
Halliburton, like the other companies awarded contracts, has strong political ties. Cheney was Halliburton’s CEO and is still receiving an annual “deferred” salary of $162,392 for 2002 and $205,298 in 2001. Ray Hunt, a director at Halliburton, is on the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board and Lawrence agleburger, another Halliburton director, was the secretary of state in the first Bush presidency.
Unocal
The Caspian Sea is thought of to be the last massive untapped oil reserve. Everyone, from Unocal to Gazprom, a Russian oil company, was trying to devise ways to exploit this multi-billion dollar possibility. Amid the flurry of companies busy devising plans, Unocal began talks with the Taliban about building a pipeline through Afghanistan. The fact that the Taliban was an oppressive regime that had housed Osama bin Laden since 1995 was not entertained until two U.S. embassies were bombed with bin Laden as the suspected culprit. Clinton responded by bombing Afghanistan ending the lucrative deal. All corporations involved in the race for the last, vast oil reserve, were out billions. What should they do?
As Michael Moore said,
“A new president wouldn’t hurt.”
In the wake of a new administration, talks of a pipeline started back up. The Taliban was back, offering bin Laden as a way of easing the political tension. All the way until 9/11, Bush was still talking to the Taliban. Of course, we all know what happened next: In a Third Reich-esk moment, the Patriot Act was passed (written before 9/11) suspending many of our constitutional rights. Bush and Co. were also able to slip in a mandate allowing companies to drill in Alaska (what did that have to do with terrorism?) and Bush started his war(s). After overthrowing the Afghanistan government, Bush appointed Zalmay Khalizad, a former Unocal consultant as the American ambassador to Afghanistan. On December 27, 2001, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan signed a pipeline deal. Finally Unocal got its oil. Wasn’t that tidy?
MCI/ World Com
Arguably the most egregious example of corporate corruption, World Com was fined $500 million for an admitted $11 million accounting fraud. In recent months and with government assistance ($700 million in government contracts), MCI/ WorldCom has emerged from its bankruptcy with a new name, hoping we all have short memories. In May, the government was highly criticized for its $45 million contract to build Iraq’s cellular telephone network for the 10,000 military and aid officials based in Iraq. The contract was not even open for bidding and many believe it will give MCI a head start in rebuilding Iraq’s wireless network. Understandably, the competition was perturbed.
“We don’t understand why MCI would be awarded this business given its status as having committed the largest corporate fraud in history…,” said Len Lauer, head of Sprint Corp’s wireless division. Motorola spokesman, Norm Sandler added, “I was curious about it, because the last time I looked, MCI’s never built out a wireless network.”
Employees and investors have lost billions. Despite this, WorldCom has been rewarded. The $500 million fine has been essentially laundered into lucrative contracts from the government. In August, after pressure from competitors, the General Service Administration (GSA) suspended further federal contracts with WorldCom, but critics fear this suspension will only last long enough to placate the masses. After a short while, many say, the company will resume business with the U.S.
While the government slaps corporations hands for billion dollar frauds, the banking industry is trying to pass the “Bankruptcy Reform Act,” which will make it more difficult for ordinary folks, like us (of which only 3% file unlawful bankruptcies), file for bankruptcy.


 

\
Corporate Rule
 
Blood Suckers
 

 

I'm in Debt! 

 
  

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
User Name:
Password:
 

Name:
Email:
Subscribe
Unsubscribe